#Araweelo_News_Network.
Heritage reportedly operates with financial backing from the Djibouti government and Villa Somalia. These ties suggest a political alignment with broader agendas that prioritize the interests of Mogadishu and Djibouti over Somaliland’s sovereignty and regional stability. If true, this funding could compromise the organization’s neutrality, framing its activities as a tool for undermining Somaliland and Ethiopia.
Concerns about a lack of diversity within Heritage’s leadership, dominated by a single clan, raise significant questions about its credibility and inclusiveness. This homogeneity might lead to a narrow, clan-based perspective that overlooks the broader complexities of the Somali-speaking regions. Such representation can alienate key stakeholders, including Somaliland, and foster division rather than unity.
Annual Meetings in Djibouti:
The decision to hold all meetings in Djibouti underscores the country’s significant role in shaping Heritage’s agenda.
These gatherings focus heavily on reviving the concept of Greater Somalia, an outdated political vision that disregards the realities of Somaliland’s independent trajectory since 1991.
The meetings are also a platform for promoting anti-Somaliland rhetoric, potentially emboldening parties opposed to Somaliland’s progress and stability.
Anti-Somaliland Sentiment:
Heritage has consistently positioned itself against Somaliland’s statehood aspirations, aligning with Villa Somalia’s stance.
The focus on unification narratives, such as Greater Somalia, undermines the self-determination and progress Somaliland has achieved over three decades.
Impact on Regional Stability:
Heritage’s activities appear to deepen divides in the Horn of Africa by antagonizing Somaliland and Ethiopia.
By opposing Ethiopia’s strategic interests, such as port access via Somaliland, the organization risks alienating a key regional ally.
This approach could destabilize already fragile relations in the region, worsening conflicts over shared resources and political influence.
Recommendations for Somaliland: Strategic Response
Unified National Stance:
Somalilanders must adopt a collective approach to counter Heritage’s influence. Intellectuals, politicians, and the diaspora should coordinate efforts to expose the organization’s agenda and present a unified defense of Somaliland’s sovereignty.
Boycotting Heritage Events:
Participation in these events risks legitimizing the organization’s anti-Somaliland activities.
Somalilanders who attend may inadvertently strengthen narratives that undermine their nation’s progress. Instead, efforts should focus on promoting Somaliland’s statehood in alternative, credible forums.
Engaging the International Community:
Diplomatic channels should be leveraged to inform allies and international organizations about Heritage’s perceived bias.
Highlighting its ties to Djibouti and Villa Somalia, as well as its exclusivist leadership, can cast doubt on its legitimacy.
Creating Counter-Narratives:
Somaliland can establish its own annual conferences or forums to discuss regional cooperation and independence.
These events should prioritize inclusivity, invite international observers, and provide a platform for showcasing Somaliland’s achievements in governance, security, and development.
Strategic Alliances:
Strengthening alliances with Ethiopia and other regional actors can counteract Heritage’s influence. Cooperative agreements, such as those involving trade and security, can solidify Somaliland’s standing as a critical player in the Horn of Africa.
Media and Public Outreach:
Somaliland’s Ministry of Information and the diaspora should run public awareness campaigns exposing the potential harm of Heritage’s agenda.
Social media and traditional outlets can be used to share Somaliland’s perspective and achievements while debunking Heritage’s narratives.
Heritage’s activities undermine Somaliland’s recognition efforts and jeopardize its achievements over the past three decades.
By aligning with Villa Somalia and opposing Ethiopia, Heritage contributes to regional instability, affecting economic and security dynamics.
Participation in such events risks creating division within Somaliland, as individuals seen as engaging with Heritage may face accusations of betraying the national cause.
Somaliland must respond decisively, emphasizing its independence, stability, and contributions to regional peace. By exposing Heritage’s biases and pursuing constructive alternatives, Somaliland can safeguard its sovereignty and advance its long-term objectives.
The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Araweelo News Network
ENG.ABDI ALI BARKHAD
(Independent Political Analysts)
tra50526@gmail.com +252 65 9555110 25/11/2024